Editorial Guidelines

Last updated: 11 September 2026

Luxury-Rehabs.com publishes treatment-provider listings and educational articles about addiction, mental health and rehab. The following standards distinguish information supplied by providers, editorial work and clinical review.

Sources and evidence

Directory information may come from providers’ published materials and other public sources. Provider claims should be attributed and checked against current information before being treated as verified facts. Where licensing or accreditation is discussed, readers should be able to identify the relevant body and facility.

Health articles should cite identifiable research, clinical guidance or public-health sources. References must lead to the cited publication, not a search result or error page. A reference list alone does not establish that every statement is supported: research populations, limitations and the difference between a study protocol and results matter.

Authorship and medical review

A publisher credit identifies who publishes a page. It is not a medical qualification. Individual authors and clinical reviewers should be credited only when their involvement is documented. A clinical-review credit should include the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials and review date.

Where no clinical reviewer is named, do not assume that an article has received an independent medical review. Publication and content-update dates are separate from a clinical-review date. Formatting changes and repaired links do not amount to revalidation of medical advice.

Comparing private and luxury rehab

Accommodation, privacy and service features should be distinguished from clinical evidence. A higher price or luxury label does not prove better outcomes. Treatment duration, detox requirements, staffing and aftercare vary; universal promises should not be inferred from a category page.

Corrections and updates

Report a concern to info@luxuryrehabs.com with the page URL, the statement in question and supporting source material. Requests are assessed against the available evidence. Substantive corrections should explain what changed; clinical claims require appropriate review. Information that cannot be substantiated should be qualified or removed.

Read our advertising disclosure, AI transparency statement and medical disclaimer.